File #: 2017-186    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/14/2017 In control: City Council
On agenda: 3/21/2017 Final action:
Title: CONSIDER SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF ASSEMBLY BILL 195 WHICH PROMOTES TRANPARENCY IN BALLOT LABELS FOR TAX INCREASES (CITY COUNCIL)
Attachments: 1. Exhibit No. 1 -- Assembly Bill 195 Support Letter.pdf, 2. Exhibit No. 2 -- AB 195 FactSheet.pdf, 3. Exhibit No. 3 -- AB 195 Proposed Amendment to EC 13119.pdf
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Report to Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, March 21, 2017
Consent


SUBJECT:
Title
CONSIDER SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF ASSEMBLY BILL 195 WHICH PROMOTES TRANPARENCY IN BALLOT LABELS FOR TAX INCREASES (CITY COUNCIL)

Body
I. SUMMARY

AB 195 promotes transparency in ballot labels for proposed tax increases sent to voters for approval. A letter in support of passage of AB 195 (as amended) has been submitted by Mayor Robles to the Legislature. City Council is asked to consider supporting AB 195 passage through endorsing the support letter.

II. RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation

CONSIDER a CITY COUNCIL ENDORSEMENT of the attached letter which supports passage of Assembly Bill 195 (as amended).


Body
III. ALTERNATIVES

TAKE any other action the City Council deems appropriate.

IV. BACKGROUND

Last year the City of Carson and six other cities in Los Angeles County took legal action seeking transparency in the ballot label for an annual County sales tax increase of $860,000,000 (Measure M) proposed by Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).
Specifically, the lawsuit sought compliance by MTA with the new requirements of Election Code ? 13119(b) which mandates that ballot labels for proposed tax increases include "the amount of money to be raised annually and the rate and duration of the tax to be levied."
Election Code ? 13119 was amended by AB 809 in 2015 to require that the ballot label for a tax increase include the rate of the tax increase, its duration, and the amount of revenue to be raised. It was the intention of the author that this information apply to all local tax measures.

A trial court judge in the lawsuit ruled (among other items) that a technicality in the law did not require MTA to disclose in the ballot label that the annual sales tax increase would be approximately $860,000,000. The trial court held that Election Code ? 13119(b) only applied to tax measures placed on the ballot by citizen's groups, and did not apply to tax meas...

Click here for full text