Report to Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, August 06, 2024
Consent
SUBJECT:
Title
CONSIDER RESOLUTION 24-070 AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 71-111, BY ADOPTING A REVISED SALARY STRUCTURE FOR BOTH THE NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR AND GIS ADMINISTRATOR; IN ADDITION, REMOVING THE GIS ADMINISTRATOR FROM THE AME BARGAINING UNIT TO THE CPSA BARGAINING UNIT. (CITY COUNCIL)
Body
I. SUMMARY
The three (3) administrator classifications (GIS Administrator, Network Administrator, and Systems Administrator) are currently misaligned in their current salary ranges. Additionally, the GIS Administrator is currently represented in the incorrect bargaining unit.
To address these discrepancies, Human Resources is requesting an adjustment to the Network Administrator and the GIS Administrator salary range to align with the pay range of the Systems Administrator (918). Furthermore, Human Resources is requesting that the GIS Administrator be removed from the AME bargaining unit to the CPSA bargaining unit.
II. RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation
WAIVE further reading and ADOPT:
Resolution 24-070, “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 77-111, BY ADOPTING A REVISED SALARY STRUCTURE FOR BOTH THE NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR AND GIS ADMINISTRATOR; IN ADDIITON, TRANSFERRING THE GIS ADMINISTRATOR CLASSIFICATION FROM THE AME BARGAINING UNIT TO THE CPSA BARGAINNING UNIT.”
Body
III. ALTERNATIVES
TAKE another action that City Council deems appropriate.
IV. BACKGROUND
Human Resources and the Information Technology Systems Department reviewed the administrator classifications, specifically the Network Administrator, GIS Administrator, and Systems Administrator, to discuss parity and consistency. This review is part of ongoing efforts by HR to recruit for the GIS Administrator position. (See Exhibit 1 - IT Administrator classification salary tables).
In reviewing all three classifications the recommendation to ensure pay equity across the three (3) classifications is due in part of:
1. Comparable skill sets and responsibilities:
Technical Expertise: GIS and Network Administrators possess specialized technical knowledge like that of Systems Administrators. GIS Administrators require proficiency in spatial data analysis and geographic information systems, while Network Administrators need expertise in network infrastructure, security, and maintenance. Systems Administrators, on the other hand, focus on managing and maintaining servers and overall IT systems.
Problem Solving: All three (3) roles involve diagnosing and resolving complex technical issues, ensuring the IT infrastructure functions smoothly and efficiently.
System Management: While Systems Administrators manage operating systems and servers, GIS Administrators manage spatial databases and GIS software, and Network Administrators oversee the network's performance and security.
2. Integral to Organizational Function:
Critical Infrastructure: The City of Carson relies on the seamless operation of its IT infrastructure. Systems, GIS, and Network Administrators each play a crucial role in maintaining this infrastructure.
Interdependency: Effective city operations depend on the integration of these roles. GIS systems require robust network support, which in turn depends on the servers and systems managed by the Systems Administrator.
Data Integrity and Security: Network Administrators ensure the security of data transmissions, GIS Administrators safeguard spatial data accuracy, and Systems Administrators protect overall system integrity.
3. Equal Impact on City Services:
Public Services: Each administrator's work directly impacts the efficiency and reliability of public services. For instance, GIS data is critical for urban planning and emergency response, reliable networks are essential for communication and data sharing, and well-maintained systems support all other IT functions.
Downtime Prevention: All three roles are essential in preventing and mitigating IT system downtimes, which can disrupt city operations and services.
4. Professional Development and Certification Requirements:
Continuous Learning: Each role requires ongoing education and certification to stay current with technological advancements and best practices.
5. Market Value and Industry Standards:
Competitive Salaries: In the broader job market, GIS, Network, and Systems Administrators often have comparable salary ranges, reflecting the similar level of expertise and responsibility required.
Retention and Recruitment: Offering equitable compensation ensures that the City of Carson remains competitive in attracting and retaining talented professionals in each of these crucial roles.
6. Organizational Fairness and Morale:
Job Satisfaction: Equitable compensation fosters a sense of fairness and job satisfaction among employees, reducing turnover and increasing productivity.
Collaboration and Teamwork: When employees feel equally valued, they are more likely to collaborate effectively, enhancing overall IT department performance.
By compensating GIS and Network Administrators at the same rate as Systems Administrators, the City of Carson acknowledges the vital contributions of each role to the city's IT infrastructure and services, promotes fairness, and aligns with industry standards.
As such, HR satisfied the conditions under the Meyers-Milias-Brown-Act (the MMBA) (Government Code 3500 et seq) as we received confirmation from The Association of Management Employees on July 9, 2024, at 4:04pm that after speaking to the board members, there was no objections with the GIS Administrator position going to the Carson Professionals and Supervisors Association. The same day, July 9, 2024, The Professionals and Supervisors Association was also informed and are also in agreement with the move.
V. FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact for the Network Administrator would result in an expenditure increase of $36,733.80 in salaries and benefits. The fiscal impact for the GIS Administrator will result in an expenditure increase of $4,930.81 Accounting for both salary range increases, the total cost to the Information Technology Securities Department would result in a total net increase of $41,663.84. The fiscal impact will be absorbed by the existing ITS Budget for fiscal year 24’-25’.
VI. EXHIBITS
1. IT Administrator classification salary tables (pgs. 5)
2. GIS Administrator Classification Specification (pgs. 6-8)
3. Resolution No. 24-070 (pgs. 9-10)
4. IT & S Organizational Chart (pg.11)
1.
Prepared by: Joshua Boudreaux, Human Resources Director; Gary Carter, IT Director