Legislation Details

File #: 2024-0623    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 7/3/2024 In control: City Council
On agenda: 12/25/2024 Final action:
Title: CONSIDER RESOLUTION 24-070 ESTABLISHING CONSISTENCY WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATOR CLASSIFICATIONS (NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, GIS ADMINISTRATOR, AND SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR) SALARY RANGE AND BARGAINING UNIT IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY DEPARTMENT (CITY COUNCIL)
Attachments: 1. Reso No. 24-070
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Report to Mayor and City Council
Tuesday, July 16, 2024
Consent


SUBJECT:
Title
CONSIDER RESOLUTION 24-070 ESTABLISHING CONSISTENCY WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATOR CLASSIFICATIONS (NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, GIS ADMINISTRATOR, AND SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR) SALARY RANGE AND BARGAINING UNIT IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY DEPARTMENT (CITY COUNCIL)

Body
I. SUMMARY

The three administrator classifications (GIS Administrator, Network Administrator, and Systems Administrator) are currently misaligned in terms of salary range. Additionally, the GIS Administrator is presently represented in an incorrect bargaining unit.
To address these discrepancies, Human Resources is requesting an adjustment to the Network Administrator's salary range to align it with that of the Systems Administrator. Furthermore, Human Resources is requesting that the GIS Administrator be moved from the AME bargaining unit to the CPSA bargaining unit, and that its salary range be adjusted to match that of the Systems Administrator.

II. RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation

WAIVE further reading and ADOPT:
Resolution 24-070, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARSON, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CONSISTENCY WITHIN THE ADMINISTRATOR CLASSIFICATION SALARY RANGE AND BARGAINNING UNIT IN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY DEPARTMENT."

Body
III. ALTERNATIVES

TAKE another action that City Council deems appropriate.

IV. BACKGROUND

Human Resources and the Information Technology Systems Department reviewed the administrator classifications, specifically the Network Administrator, GIS Administrator, and Systems Administrator, to discuss parity and consistency. This review is part of ongoing efforts by HR to recruit for the GIS Administrator position.


V. FISCAL IMPACT

The fiscal impact for the Network Administrator would result in an expenditure increase of $33,908.14 in salaries and benefits. The fiscal impact for the GIS Administrator will result in an expenditure increase of $4,550.81. Acc...

Click here for full text